CraftWEB Hot Glass Talk  

Go Back   CraftWEB Hot Glass Talk > Hot Glass > Antiques & Classics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-03-2006, 10:20 AM
Rich Federici's Avatar
Rich Federici Rich Federici is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vineland, New Jersey
Posts: 175
Rich Federici is on a distinguished road
Phosphate Opal

After reading an older thread on Phosphate opals, I tried the following:

Quantities in pounds, except as shown

Sand 20
Soda Ash 4.6
Hydrted Lime 2
Zinc Oxide 1.2
Borax 3
Alumina Hydrate .6
Lithium Carb .6
Potassium Nitrate 73grams
Sodium Tripolyphosphate 2.8

After melting, I got a lot of crap on top but the glass underneath seems to be ok. I could have melted hotter, but wanted to take it easy because of glass in the other 2 pots.
My question is would a change to the time and temps of the melt help to reduce the junk on top, or is this just the way it is with this particular formula. The original purpose was to have a white that would be fairly dense, and have a viscosity close to the other colors that I make would have.
__________________
Rich
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-03-2006, 11:02 AM
Pete VanderLaan's Avatar
Pete VanderLaan Pete VanderLaan is offline
The Old Gaffer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chocorua New Hampshire
Posts: 19,249
Pete VanderLaan is on a distinguished road
Phosphates are not really dense glasses. They can and must be melted hot 2325F or higher. The junk will diminish is you melt hotter but it's almost always a problem in cooler melts.. Screen the phosphate materials. You can go up to 5% phosphate before you will hit a compatibility wall. Borax helps.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-03-2006, 04:18 PM
Rich Federici's Avatar
Rich Federici Rich Federici is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vineland, New Jersey
Posts: 175
Rich Federici is on a distinguished road
Thank You Pete,

I will see what it looks like tomorrow, Maybe sitting all day helped to fix it some.

The neat thing that I see with the small pieces that pop off the punty is that when you hold them up to the light, you can see that reddish orange glow near the the thinner edge. It looks like they are lit up from the inside.
__________________
Rich
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-03-2006, 06:46 PM
Hugh Jenkins Hugh Jenkins is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Honoka'a, HI
Posts: 989
Hugh Jenkins is on a distinguished road
Also be absolutely sure you are oxidizing. If you are gas melting, the flame can often be partially reducing at the core even if there is total combustion in the fire box. A really clean burn is needed for phosphate.
Certain colorants that are bi or tri-valent seem to help in maintaining a little longer stability of the phosphate. Manganese at .1% is great for this and won't effect the color. Copper and chrome additions will create color but also extend the life of phosphate opals in the pot. Otherwise it is necessary to get them out within a day or so.
__________________
Aloha, Hugh
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-04-2006, 09:46 AM
Kenny Pieper Kenny Pieper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Burnsville N.C.
Posts: 774
Kenny Pieper is on a distinguished road
Also dont let it sit too cold. The chuncks will come back. I have found that there is a fine line when melting to get it into solution and when the opal starts to weeken or burn out. Takes lots of heat like Pete says
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-04-2006, 10:53 AM
Rich Federici's Avatar
Rich Federici Rich Federici is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vineland, New Jersey
Posts: 175
Rich Federici is on a distinguished road
Today's news

I removed the scum from the top and have made a few test pieces. A simple thread test stayed pretty straight. Incidentally, I ordered my Spruce Pine 87 a little too late,having run out, I made my own clear glass.

One was a cylinder to cut and check as a ring test piece, it is in the annealer and I will see tomorrow. One thing that I noticed on the trim scrap was the white glass still seems to have a rough texture.

It looks ok cased in clear but by itself, not too smooth. It almost looks like tiny bubbles that when you feel them exhibit a rough texture.

Am I too picky? or is that what this is supposed to look like.

You guys were right in that it seems less dense than the cryolite white.

I like this two furnace thing but may have to put the brakes on for a while and shut one of them off. The latest gas bill topped $1700.

Thanks for all of your help.
__________________
Rich
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-04-2006, 04:48 PM
Pete VanderLaan's Avatar
Pete VanderLaan Pete VanderLaan is offline
The Old Gaffer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chocorua New Hampshire
Posts: 19,249
Pete VanderLaan is on a distinguished road
Re: Today's news

Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Federici

I like this two furnace thing but may have to put the brakes on for a while and shut one of them off. The latest gas bill topped $1700.

Thanks for all of your help.
*********

I'm proud of you bucko! I love it when I see people using the class.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-04-2006, 05:17 PM
Rich Federici's Avatar
Rich Federici Rich Federici is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vineland, New Jersey
Posts: 175
Rich Federici is on a distinguished road
This afternoon's work

This afternoon we pulled some white stars cased in dark blue.

The white was the phosphate opal, and the blue was cobalt oxide tinted SP87.

The phosphate white is definitely not as dense, but... the star seemed to hold its shape better.

The murrini also seemed to cut better than the cane we did a while back with the cryolite white, which some split as we were trying to cut them.

The second part of the test is to see how sharp or how distorted the murrini become on the surface of a small blown piece, like the size of an ornament.

Now looking at the 2 stars side by side
at this point I might have to vote for the Phosphate opal as far as keeping its shape but we shall see tomorrow.

Pete, I really got a lot out of the class and now I finally have all my ducks in a row enough to put some of what you taught us in practice.
__________________
Rich
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-04-2006, 05:21 PM
Rich Federici's Avatar
Rich Federici Rich Federici is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vineland, New Jersey
Posts: 175
Rich Federici is on a distinguished road
Heat for this stuff

Pete or Kenny,

First, Thanks again, and second, what kind of melt cycle might you run for the above formula?

Since hot is key, how hot do you think, and how long?
__________________
Rich
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-04-2006, 08:02 PM
Pete VanderLaan's Avatar
Pete VanderLaan Pete VanderLaan is offline
The Old Gaffer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chocorua New Hampshire
Posts: 19,249
Pete VanderLaan is on a distinguished road
no less than 2300F. Screen it well. Small charges. Proof after each charge and hold the charges until the proofs show no unmelted stuff. The path to phosphate opals leads to madness.

You are not going to like this stuff for murrinis. It is not dense enough. Incredibly beautiful as a stand alone. The viscosity will be very similar to your basic clear.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-05-2006, 02:55 AM
John Croucher's Avatar
John Croucher John Croucher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 52
John Croucher is on a distinguished road
P2O5 over 5% is pretty much asking for trouble. Your recipe comes out at 5.3%. Back off 15% on the STP, substitute for the soda content you have lost and try again. Redox is irrelevant in my opinion (sorry Hugh) -its all about the devit temp of the apatite crystal/globule you are creating at temp within the matrix.
Colorants may change the devit temp, so Hugh's advice has some relevance.

Pb brings down the devit temp if you want to go down that route. According to Weyl a little F2 stabilises the apatite emulsion (think teeth)which is why the old bone ash recipes seemed to work better. A lot of the 19th century recipes used guano (sea bird shit) and incorporated a little Greenland cryolite or CaF2 in a hydrid P/F recipe to accommodate the difficulties of a pure P opal, even though guano probably had suffient F at temp.

Animal bone ash contains F, in maybe the right stabilising proportion.

Pure phosphate opals are a route to madness but can be conquered, albeit with quite a bit of experimentation..

Don't expect a dense white, but phosphate opals are good for stiffness and are user friendly re pollution. There is more color play with a reddish transmission and there are a whole heap of color combos. They certainly need to be melted and worked out hot to stop devit. Theoretically they shouldn't fade with time at temp as against F opals, which do lose opacity owing to F volativity, but you can never know for sure with colored glass making.

The bottom line -opal phosphates are one of the last exciting frontiers of studio glassmaking.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-05-2006, 04:06 AM
Hugh Jenkins Hugh Jenkins is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Honoka'a, HI
Posts: 989
Hugh Jenkins is on a distinguished road
John, Great to read your contribution on this. Devit and phospate concentration are the main issues. But from experience in melting, the flame settings did make a lot of difference. One reason that most clear batches cannot be made into phospate opals is the presence of antimony. Since antimony acts as an oxygen absorber in the cooling phase, it can reduce certain less stable oxides. Identical oxide formulas without antimony were way more successful. Keeping the phosphate down in the 4 to 4.5% range gives beautiful results.
__________________
Aloha, Hugh
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-05-2006, 07:08 AM
Pete VanderLaan's Avatar
Pete VanderLaan Pete VanderLaan is offline
The Old Gaffer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chocorua New Hampshire
Posts: 19,249
Pete VanderLaan is on a distinguished road
Bob Held did some good work on this back around 1973 and demonstrated that up to ( not exceeding) 5% phosphate would still be compatible. I did melt it and it did work and it was troublesome. We usd this old stuff mark Peiser had called Bone Ash 21 which is long gone. It was a genuine bone Ash, not a synthetic. . I do think that if you use Sodium triphosphate, it would help to back off of sodium somwhere else.

The devit is clearly an issue and I agree with john that lead would help here but it is lead...

And John, obviously we got around your posting problem on the board. Good to see you here being my fussy conscience.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-05-2006, 01:01 PM
Dave Bross Dave Bross is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Archer FL(near Gainesville)
Posts: 2,883
Dave Bross is on a distinguished road
Many thanks to John for participating too.

Here's the original thread on phosphates from here:

http://talk.craftweb.com/showthread....&threadid=3284

and...

Here were my last discoveries on phosphates before all the turmoil that shut me down.....

Sodium tripolyphosphate ended up being the best phosphate source for the least amount of chunkiness. It's a common ingredient in cleaning compounds and easily available at the chemical supply outfits.

The amount of calcium has a large effect on the density and strike of the melt, more calcium seems to equal less strike/density.

Viscosity does seem to be a key issue. I got a fairly decent and quite dense 6% phosphate melt in the last melt recipe listed in the old thread with more lithium and zinc. The low viscosity melts strike quite a bit right out of the pot. They also digest your pot.

I used 1.5% alumina in the melts but in retrospect I wonder if that was adding to the chunky/devit problems. I would think all the zinc would substitute nicely for the durability enhancements alumina brings but Volf warns that this is not so. Unfortunately, Volf didn't explain, just listing a reference to another publication.

I decided to stay away from fluorine due to the electric melter but after reading John's take on Volf I think I'll at least try to match what might have been in the original bone ash.

I'm stuck at low melt temps. with the wire melter but I would definitely like any suggestions on lowering the devit temp. other than with lead. I suspect that the high zinc percentage helps that? Time to go trolling in Volf again.

I think the low toxicity of these glasses will be important in the future.

along the lines of lower toxic glass...

I'm curious about the old glasses using talc (magnesium silicate) for an opacifier too. Probably not much more than an alabaster sort of opaqueness due to the 5-6% limits on the talc.
I tried a tin opacified glass and it was terrible, so short it wasn't workable.
__________________
Art is not a thing...it's a way.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-05-2006, 01:50 PM
Hugh Jenkins Hugh Jenkins is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Honoka'a, HI
Posts: 989
Hugh Jenkins is on a distinguished road
When I was teaching and any time I have been at Penland, we used Spruce Pine. The color base for SPB is a good match but holds out the decolorizers, fining agents and oxidizers. We were able to make better phosphate opals with that than we did mixing our own batch. I think Labino covered a lot of things with the formula that SPB is based on. It has small amounts of many things that just seem to help. The zinc, boron, flourine and barium are not enough to really change the glass much but they are just right for selenium-cad colors, phosphate opals, fairly saturated transparents, holding silver and gold in reasonable amounts, etc. I have actually come to like other clear formulas better for working properties, but I think that for most color making, this is a great basic glass.

I'll dig around and see if I can find the notes on that mix. In order to compensate for the sodium in the STP we had to make almost complete glass with the STP and add it in proportions to the color base.
__________________
Aloha, Hugh
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-05-2006, 04:40 PM
Henry Halem Henry Halem is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kent, OH
Posts: 1,418
Henry Halem is on a distinguished road
No Strike Clause

As an aside to melting phosphate opals here is a short story on Peiser's adventure with Phosphate opals in the early 70's. Mark figured out early on how to melt really nice phosphate opals. His adventures with phosphate opals began during the spring and summer down in NC. He developed really fantastic colors but for some od reason when winter came (or the other way around) the same phosphate formula that worked so well during the summer would not work at all during the winter. It drove him buggy. Eventually he came to sort of believe that the difference was in the moisture content of his chemicals.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-05-2006, 04:53 PM
Dave Bross Dave Bross is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Archer FL(near Gainesville)
Posts: 2,883
Dave Bross is on a distinguished road
I too think there is something to that. I've melted with and without wetting down the batch and the wet went way better.

A side note on that... Hugh had told me about using a tiny amount of manganese to oxidise it. When melted dry the opal was white, when melted wet it would be a very pretty rose color, which says to me a radical change (increase) in the oxygen content of the glass, bringing the manganese into the valence state showing max color.

What Hugh mentions about compensating batch and the amount of sodium in tsp is another possible reason to use the sodium tripoly phosphate. The stpp is .42 sodium and .58 phosphorous, the tsp is .24 sodium, .19 phosphorus, .57 H2O.

I think Nick's glass is a great formula too, with the exception of too much lithium to work as a lampworking glass. I shouldn't really complain about that either, it was never intended for lampwork when it was designed.
__________________
Art is not a thing...it's a way.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-05-2006, 05:39 PM
Rich Federici's Avatar
Rich Federici Rich Federici is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vineland, New Jersey
Posts: 175
Rich Federici is on a distinguished road
what came out of the annealer today

So the white pieces that were cased looked real nice. I made a pineapple mold ball from just the white and it feels like sandpaper on the surface.

Perhaps I did not melt hot enough, and I probably put too much in at one time. These are things that now I know I can fix I also will have to balance which colors and how I charge with regard to doing the hotter ones first.

Thank you John Croucher and to everyone that chimed in on this project. I will go back and study some more, hopefully to make this better next time.
__________________
Rich
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-06-2006, 06:30 AM
Pete VanderLaan's Avatar
Pete VanderLaan Pete VanderLaan is offline
The Old Gaffer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chocorua New Hampshire
Posts: 19,249
Pete VanderLaan is on a distinguished road
when I try to make it better, lots of times I just make it different. We call it another triumph of hope over experience Pay attention to lowering the phosphate content as John Suggests. 4% is nice.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-07-2006, 05:16 PM
Dave Bross Dave Bross is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Archer FL(near Gainesville)
Posts: 2,883
Dave Bross is on a distinguished road
One more thought... you can repeat cooling and heating (restriking) the lower percentage phosphates for more density. The glass gets quite stiff and it is time consuming.
__________________
Art is not a thing...it's a way.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-11-2009, 07:18 AM
Pete VanderLaan's Avatar
Pete VanderLaan Pete VanderLaan is offline
The Old Gaffer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chocorua New Hampshire
Posts: 19,249
Pete VanderLaan is on a distinguished road
I am getting ready to try making some phosphate opals and in going back to this thread I found it to be so useful as to be worth bringing back to the front. I will eventually move it to Antiques and Classics.

I have acquired sodium tripolyphosphate from Univar in Providence which was kind of pricey at $1.80 lb. If dave is reading this I was wondering how carefully you screened, or crushed the stuff? Chunkyness has always been a big issue with these glasses. I am by the way finding that a small coffee grinder is a fabulous way to crush small quantities of chemicals.

It makes the coffee taste funny though.

Rich, in looking at the formula you originally used for this thead, . What L.E.C. were you aiming at with that glass? Was it an SP compatible?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-11-2009, 01:49 PM
Rich Federici's Avatar
Rich Federici Rich Federici is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vineland, New Jersey
Posts: 175
Rich Federici is on a distinguished road
Dear Pete.
when I melted this, I found the sodium tripolyphosphate at a place called the chemistry store online in 50 lb. bags, at about $2.00 a pound. They sell home soapmaking stuff.

I made star murrinis with cobalt blue from regular SP87, no splitting occurred.

I only tried it one time, and the crap floating on the top was a real issue for me. I hope to re visit this again because the fire opal possibilities really excite me.

Incidentally, the bag of sodium tripolyphosphte says "for use in water purification systems" , a plus!
__________________
Rich
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-11-2009, 01:56 PM
Pete VanderLaan's Avatar
Pete VanderLaan Pete VanderLaan is offline
The Old Gaffer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chocorua New Hampshire
Posts: 19,249
Pete VanderLaan is on a distinguished road
Did you really crush the stuff? Or did you just add it. Screened? what?

Also If I try it your way i will mix the lithium and the polyphosphate together if you remember that particular trick?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-11-2009, 03:41 PM
Dave Bross Dave Bross is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Archer FL(near Gainesville)
Posts: 2,883
Dave Bross is on a distinguished road
Here's a link to an old post of mine explaining "the fix" for chunky phosphates:

http://talk.craftweb.com/showthread....e+opals&page=2

Here's the text from there to save everyone a trip:


///////////////////////////////////////////////

I've been trying to get a phosphate opal without the "texture" for a while now. The answer turned out to be mainly in the modifiers.

You don't use more than 3% calcium, 5% strontium, or 9.5% barium while using at least .4 - 1%, but not more than 2% zinc to help retard the formation of the dreaded surface crystals, and 2-5.5% phosphorus.


I (finally!!!) found all this in an old Corning patent, US patent # 4536480. I've done some melts with the calcium, strontium, zinc and phosphorus (no barium) in those ranges and it works beautifully in terms of no surface ugliness and the usual great beauty of phosphate opal.

The patent also suggests 1.5% fluorine to get a little apetite cryatalization going, but as a wire melter kind of guy I left that alone, and I'm quite happy with the opal I got without it. a bit of reading between the lines suggests you will do fine without the fluorine, making...

"glasses wherein the opal phase is essentially non-crystaline; i.e., the opacity results from the presence of immiscible glass phases"

After all those melts of "sandpaper" phosphate opal I think I'll pass on any kind of crystals in my phosphate melt.

Obviously, you would have to batch this one from scratch because no stock batch goes that low in all those modifiers.

I like sodium tripolyphosphate for a phosphorous source. It's pretty common at chemical suppliers, it's used in a lot of cleaning formulations.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Just screen the STPP and it will be fine. It really almost doesn't even need that but I do it just in case there's something unexpected in there.

Don't worry about contact mixing lithium with it, it will go down just fine as-is. After everyones struggles with getting phosphate to melt you're going to be surprised at how easily this melts.

Y'all are just going to LOVE what you get if you go to the trouble of batching these. Colors are amazing done up in phosphate. So much more stable and less toxic than fluorines too.
__________________
Art is not a thing...it's a way.

Last edited by Dave Bross; 04-11-2009 at 03:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-11-2009, 04:21 PM
Pete VanderLaan's Avatar
Pete VanderLaan Pete VanderLaan is offline
The Old Gaffer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chocorua New Hampshire
Posts: 19,249
Pete VanderLaan is on a distinguished road
well, I want the opal and I have a five pot moly. I have to build a little gas unit for the fluorine opals anyway but it would be really nice to not have two furnaces on at once these days.

I have to confess that what you have written in terms of formulation is utterly incomprehnsible to me the way they are written. Do you mind putting down a basic formula (without strontium, which is one of your favorites i know but I don't want to get into another bulk item in the batch room ). I already get the notion that this is an emulsion glass and the phosphate glass is embedded in the silicate glass. What i see you saying is to not go above 3% Ca and 2% Zn. That's 5%. Are you advocating that to be the max of the network modifier?

Spit it out.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 AM.


All published comments within these message boards are the opinions of its contributor and does not represent
the opinion(s) of the owner(s) of this website. Please see the Terms of Use file for more details.

Books to Help Artists Avoid Online Scams: Top 10 Email Scams | Social Media Scams

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CraftWEB.com. Opportunity Network. 2008. All Rights Reserved.