CraftWEB Hot Glass Talk  

Go Back   CraftWEB Hot Glass Talk > Hot Glass > General Hot Glass Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-05-2018, 10:56 AM
Jeff Wright's Avatar
Jeff Wright Jeff Wright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Milan, Michigan, USA
Posts: 219
Jeff Wright is on a distinguished road
Question: Yield from Spruce Pine batch

Hi all. I have a quick quick question that I should know the answer to but all my notes are packed away. If I melt 50 pounds of Spruce Pine batch, how much glass should I expect the yield to be?

Oops - sorry for the typo in the question. Seems like I can't edit it.

Last edited by Jeff Wright; 07-05-2018 at 10:58 AM. Reason: Typo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-05-2018, 12:50 PM
Pete VanderLaan's Avatar
Pete VanderLaan Pete VanderLaan is offline
The Old Gaffer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chocorua New Hampshire
Posts: 20,088
Pete VanderLaan is on a distinguished road
I don't have the exact number in my head but it was between 16-19%
__________________
Where are we going and why am I in this basket?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-05-2018, 03:04 PM
Jeff Wright's Avatar
Jeff Wright Jeff Wright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Milan, Michigan, USA
Posts: 219
Jeff Wright is on a distinguished road
Thanks Pete. I'm assuming that is the loss factor. If it's the actual yield then I have to rethink what I'm doing!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-05-2018, 04:35 PM
Pete VanderLaan's Avatar
Pete VanderLaan Pete VanderLaan is offline
The Old Gaffer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chocorua New Hampshire
Posts: 20,088
Pete VanderLaan is on a distinguished road
Thumbs down

think this way: for every hundred pounds you melt, you get 81 lbs of glass. This is a valid argument that cullet sellers make that's real and true. in cullet, 100lbs is indeed 100 lbs. SP is higher in volition loss than some , lower than some others. It's all in the Carbon dioxide loss.
In favor of batch, the working range is longer, even if it's the same formula. The brilliance is better and it's normally less cordy. Working range is way better. How did I used to put it?

"Oh, no free lunch " That was it...

In Game of Thrones? "Counting Coppers. " Make better work.
__________________
Where are we going and why am I in this basket?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-05-2018, 04:55 PM
Jordan Kube Jordan Kube is offline
?
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,607
Jordan Kube is on a distinguished road
My spreadsheet has the glasses I melt that are similar to your formulas, Pete, coming in at about 15% calculated.
__________________
WWUD? Think for yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-05-2018, 05:16 PM
Pete VanderLaan's Avatar
Pete VanderLaan Pete VanderLaan is offline
The Old Gaffer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chocorua New Hampshire
Posts: 20,088
Pete VanderLaan is on a distinguished road
I can believe that Jordan.

Co2 is clearly an influence. Batch as opposed to cullet is still a better glass, but that has to matter.s f
I have questions for you when you used the lithopones for the cad sel colors. Could you PM me as to what you were doing? I'm quite interested, particularly given the way current events are leaning.
__________________
Where are we going and why am I in this basket?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-06-2018, 09:00 AM
Josh Bernbaum Josh Bernbaum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brattleboro, VT
Posts: 548
Josh Bernbaum is on a distinguished road
Moisture content has to be factored in with the pelletized batch, right? I imagine that is some weight loss there too, more so than in un-pelletized, powdered batch. When I have melted my own batch mixes, the level seems to drop down far less than the pelletized. Maybe partly due to less interstitial air spaces between the "pellets"?
__________________
www.jmbglass.com
instagram.com/joshbernbaum_glass
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-06-2018, 09:22 AM
Pete VanderLaan's Avatar
Pete VanderLaan Pete VanderLaan is offline
The Old Gaffer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chocorua New Hampshire
Posts: 20,088
Pete VanderLaan is on a distinguished road
There must be some Josh but not a lot. The chemically bound stuff is more what you need to look at. I don't see where SP uses any chemically bound water since it explodes like popcorn and that gets all over the place. I have been impressed at how easy it is to break up big iceberg sized chunks of batch in the mixer. It's an issue for me since I periodically now want to add colorants to the stuff Tom Mixes for me.
But if you add up all the CO2 that comes off the ingredients, you lose quite a bit. It's also true that home mixed, non pelletized batch melts a lot faster.
__________________
Where are we going and why am I in this basket?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 AM.


All published comments within these message boards are the opinions of its contributor and does not represent
the opinion(s) of the owner(s) of this website. Please see the Terms of Use file for more details.

Books to Help Artists Avoid Online Scams: Top 10 Email Scams | Social Media Scams

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CraftWEB.com. Opportunity Network. 2008. All Rights Reserved.